I noticed that, the last dash on the right edge has a part with wrong opacity. Also there is another minor problem about masking.
#Libavg filled rectangle software
Thank you very much Orionist! May I know what software did you use to generate the outlines? Then I might be able to try that out later on more other icons. Regards, - Orionist ★ talk 10:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Reply
#Libavg filled rectangle code
you can paste the code into your file, the resulting size should be about 2.4 kb. Below are the outlined paths, cropped to the visible area. Converting to outlines might not be an elegant solution, but it guarantees that you get the exact appearance you want. Can anyone spot the problem? Or is there other ways to achieve the same effect? Thanks in advance – Peter CX& Talk 19:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Reply Hi Peter! I came to tell you that you needed to match the two paths in the file, but apparently you figured that out already! The thumbnails still show thin red lines linking the sides of the dashes, and I couldn't find a way to get rid of them without outlining. I was able to achieve that in IE9, Firefox and Chrome, but not on the Commons or the SVG check. The file File:BSicon SANDBOX.svg has a mask within it, and the desired outcome is a pair of parallel dashed line following the cubic bezier curve. Hi all, I recently have a problem about rendering an SVG correctly. Best regards, - Orionist ★ talk 19:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC) Reply File:BSicon SANDBOX.svg
By the way, I took the chance to do some optimization for your file, now the arrows and points are more consistent and the file size is down to less than 5kb. We also have a tool called Commons:SVG Check that shows how the file will look when uploaded, and what errors it might contain. I haven't heard of a caching delay of more than a year, but I'm sure that's the case here.
Clear your cache whenever your changes don't display, especially after re-uploading a file. Most probably, all you need is to clear your browser's cache, you can do that by holding "shift" and clicking on the "refresh" button in your browser. I reverted to the old 2010 version and it displayed correctly. It contained all the edits you did and displayed them correctly in the thumbnail, in the browser and on my PC. KYN ( talk) 22:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC) Reply I checked the image you last uploaded and it was absolutely fine. The image is produced in Inkscape, and I tested the stroke-to-path trick and it doesn't seem to make things going, the image is still OK in Inscape and not OK when uploaded to wikipedia.
#Libavg filled rectangle download
The file that I download from wikipedia doesn't even contain the text fragments that are rendered in the image by wikipedia. Just now I can't see what the problem is. The text where the green lines intersect should read "Camera center" not "Focal point" and the arrows in the image plane should point in the opposite direction relative to the arrows in the upper right. I uploaded the file just downloaded to my laptop (that looks fine) again to wikipedia, and it still renders as one of the old version. I can download the SVG file from wikipedia and render it in Inkscape and it looks just right, but the image that is rendered in wikipedia is still wrong. Now that I return to this image, the problem remains. I then thought this was some temporary problem and just forgot about. There should be some altered text and directions of arrows reversed. When I uploaded it, however, the rendered image was the same as the last before version. I uploaded the first versions of this image some years ago, and about a year ago I made a last modification.
0 kommentar(er)
